PLANE SPRAYING Chemtrails1 VISUAL PROOF THAT CHEMTRAILS ARE FOR REAL

 

A sig­nif­i­cant set of obser­va­tions has taken place. On Mother’s Day and the day fol­low­ing of 2007, another major aerosol oper­a­tion was con­ducted over the skies of the Santa Fe, New Mex­ico region. A more detailed visual exam­i­na­tion of some of these emis­sions has been made; mechan­i­cal, arti­fi­cial and sys­tem­atic intro­duc­tion of the aerosols appears evi­dent. There are two pri­mary observed anom­alies at this time: the first of these is the pres­ence of what may be referred to as “core tracks” (ribbon-like; pos­si­bly fil­a­men­tous in nature) and the sec­ond is the repeated pres­ence of a char­ac­ter­is­tic “pulse” emis­sion. The behav­ior and char­ac­ter of these anom­alies is now being pre­sented and an ade­quate basis for fur­ther exam­i­na­tion exists with this arti­cle. These char­ac­ter­is­tics are com­pletely out of accor­dance with any claims of metero­log­i­cal dis­con­ti­nu­ities in the atmos­phere, any uni­form fluid or gas dynamic analy­sis, and any unmod­i­fied com­bus­tive process. It is appar­ent that dis­tri­b­u­tions of dis­crete mate­r­ial into the atmos­phere are tak­ing place. Com­plete Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of these processes and the unusual chem­i­cal and phys­i­cal reac­tions that accom­pany them are required to safe­guard the wel­fare and inter­ests of the cit­i­zens of this planet.

core1 VISUAL PROOF THAT CHEMTRAILS ARE FOR REAL
Asym­met­ric “Core Tracks” within the aerosol trail
May 13th, 2007, Santa Fe, NM
Exposed shortly after pas­sage of air­craft.
Core tracks appear in this case on one wing side of the air­craft only.

core2 VISUAL PROOF THAT CHEMTRAILS ARE FOR REAL

Expo­sure taken a few sec­onds after the pre­ced­ing pho­to­graph.
Notice the rib­bon has become dis­placed, but has main­tained its form;
this indi­cates a dis­crete sub­stance from that of the trail.

It has been a ques­tion for some time as to why the “pen­d­ules” form as a reg­u­lar com­po­nent of the aerosol trails. It has been claimed by some that such pen­d­ules are just a nor­mal devel­op­ment from cus­tom­ary metero­log­i­cal con­di­tions. They have been referred to by cer­tain par­ties as virga, which are defined as ” wisps of pre­cip­i­ta­tion stream­ing from a cloud but evap­o­rat­ing before reach­ing the ground1.” Two objec­tions can be imme­di­ately raised: first we are not deal­ing with “clouds” by def­i­n­i­tion (as clouds and con­ven­tional air­craft emis­sions are entirely dif­fer­ent phys­i­cal processes), and sec­ond, such a phe­nom­e­non would obey uni­form laws of motion and not be com­monly recorded in a rep­e­ti­tious or pulse for­ma­tion. It is also clear that the aerosol mate­ri­als are not imme­di­ately descending(as pre­cip­i­ta­tion is expected to), but that they are expand­ing and are part of an extended physical-chemical reac­tion out­side any bounds of evap­o­ra­tion. In addi­tion, such pen­d­ules will not be observed in com­bi­na­tion with nor­mal con­trail for­ma­tion, as evap­o­ra­tion, dis­si­pa­tion and rapid mix­ing of the heated water vapor into the air will dom­i­nate that process. It has also been clear for some time that an asym­met­ric process is involved in many of the aerosol for­ma­tions, how­ever, any clar­i­fi­ca­tion of that process has eluded most observers.   Spe­cial thanks to Rense.com and Carnicom.com

 

KEN PFEIFER  MUFON NEW JERSEY

 

WWW.WORLDUFOPHOTOS.ORG

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Trackbacks
Newsletter Signup!

Yes, I want to become a mem­ber of the mail­ing list newsletter@ufoweek.com.
Please remove me from mail­ing list newsletter@ufoweek.com.
Enter your e-mail address:

Please con­firm your e-mail address: